"No Blind People Allowed" Signs
Mar. 31st, 2008 05:13 amThere is a gentleman in the so-called blindness community who is a self-proclaimed accessibility evangelist. I'm not particularly fond of the term, but that's what he calls himself. And I like the guy, not to mention the fact that he has done a lot by way of improving accessibility in many areas.
One area, though, where I have a great deal of difficulty with this person is his analogies. One of this person's huge concerns is accessible captcha, those words, letters and numbers that you have to type on some Web pages to gain access to a particular product or service. This gentleman is a very strong advocate for what I call partially-accessible captcha. I say partially because he feels a battle is won if an audio captcha is provided, a solution which is no solution at all if you are a deafblind person.
But his analogy with the inaccessible captcha has been comparing our situation to that faced by African-Americans during the civil rights fight. It's a horrid comparison: yes, we need sighted assistance to gain access to these sites, but once in, we face neither death, bodily injuries, threats, nor even persecution. I sincerely doubt that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would have approved of the analogy. Further, this accessibility evengelist says, inaccessible captcha is the same as putting up a "no blind people allowed" sign. This is simply not true. While I agree that captcha or its equivalent should be accessible TO THE BLIND AND TO THE DEAFBLIND, nobody will kick you out if you get sighted assistance to sign you up.
I bring up this dreary subject again because, in my insomniac state, I got to wondering if this gentleman has ever experienced a real "no blind people allowed" sign. A dear friend of mine was in China recently. She told me that, in front of some public facilities, were signs that proclaimed that any disabled person caught trying to use the facilities would be arrested. It really made me stop and think how good we ahve it here. It's not perfect, to be sure. There are lots of things that could be improved. But as a disabled person, there are many more discriminatory places I could be living in than Canada or the United States.
It just seems very, very wrong to me, and I'm not saying this to pick a fight, to use analogies to represent the problems of something like inaccessible captcha and compare them to true oppression, to true, intentional discrimination. It seems insulting to those who suffered and even died in the causes sited by that analogy to compare them to something as, let's face it, minor in the grand scheme of things as captcha.
One area, though, where I have a great deal of difficulty with this person is his analogies. One of this person's huge concerns is accessible captcha, those words, letters and numbers that you have to type on some Web pages to gain access to a particular product or service. This gentleman is a very strong advocate for what I call partially-accessible captcha. I say partially because he feels a battle is won if an audio captcha is provided, a solution which is no solution at all if you are a deafblind person.
But his analogy with the inaccessible captcha has been comparing our situation to that faced by African-Americans during the civil rights fight. It's a horrid comparison: yes, we need sighted assistance to gain access to these sites, but once in, we face neither death, bodily injuries, threats, nor even persecution. I sincerely doubt that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would have approved of the analogy. Further, this accessibility evengelist says, inaccessible captcha is the same as putting up a "no blind people allowed" sign. This is simply not true. While I agree that captcha or its equivalent should be accessible TO THE BLIND AND TO THE DEAFBLIND, nobody will kick you out if you get sighted assistance to sign you up.
I bring up this dreary subject again because, in my insomniac state, I got to wondering if this gentleman has ever experienced a real "no blind people allowed" sign. A dear friend of mine was in China recently. She told me that, in front of some public facilities, were signs that proclaimed that any disabled person caught trying to use the facilities would be arrested. It really made me stop and think how good we ahve it here. It's not perfect, to be sure. There are lots of things that could be improved. But as a disabled person, there are many more discriminatory places I could be living in than Canada or the United States.
It just seems very, very wrong to me, and I'm not saying this to pick a fight, to use analogies to represent the problems of something like inaccessible captcha and compare them to true oppression, to true, intentional discrimination. It seems insulting to those who suffered and even died in the causes sited by that analogy to compare them to something as, let's face it, minor in the grand scheme of things as captcha.