I am offended that yolu would consider fantisy and science fiction "writing styles." They are genres. To me, a writing style is a way of portraying a particular time period. I suspect that for me, the statement that sci-fi and fantisy are writing styles is like saying to you, "catchup is just another condiment."
p.s. Some people, such as stephen King, should never ever write science fiction. As brilliant a writer as he is, he just doesn't have the nak for this genre. I rather enjoy when the two genres mix. I'd love to read a book in which an author living in a magic world tries to imagine a world in which magic doesn't exist, but where the principles he dreams up, though scientifically theoretial, wind up being undoable accept through magical means (i.e. you could lift heavy objects by lessening gravity.) Okay, maybe this wouldn't make a good book, but perhaps a short story.
Hmmm, I have to take issue with your logic here. Science fiction is a genre, absolutely, but good science fiction requires a distinct writing style of its own. consider the following brief excerpt, which I am about to make up:
Jodi lay on the anti-grav bed, her body writhing with pleasure every time the android kissed her. "Oh, XK41295B!" she moaned, "I love it when your oil can rattles!"
That could best be described in a lot of ways, none complimentary, but for our purposes I'd call that the cheesy romance genre, written in the clueless science fiction writing style. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, I submit, which is real writing, is a humorous book, genre, written in a sci-fi writing style. Some of Robert Heinlein's work is in the science fiction genre, but with a humorous writing style.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 09:58 pm (UTC)slightly offended
Date: 2008-03-11 01:52 pm (UTC)I suspect that for me, the statement that sci-fi and fantisy are writing styles is like saying to you, "catchup is just another condiment."
p.s. Some people, such as stephen King, should never ever write science fiction. As brilliant a writer as he is, he just doesn't have the nak for this genre. I rather enjoy when the two genres mix.
I'd love to read a book in which an author living in a magic world tries to imagine a world in which magic doesn't exist, but where the principles he dreams up, though scientifically theoretial, wind up being undoable accept through magical means (i.e. you could lift heavy objects by lessening gravity.)
Okay, maybe this wouldn't make a good book, but perhaps a short story.
Re: slightly offended
Date: 2008-03-11 02:03 pm (UTC)Jodi lay on the anti-grav bed, her body writhing with pleasure every time the android kissed her. "Oh, XK41295B!" she moaned, "I love it when your oil can rattles!"
That could best be described in a lot of ways, none complimentary, but for our purposes I'd call that the cheesy romance genre, written in the clueless science fiction writing style. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, I submit, which is real writing, is a humorous book, genre, written in a sci-fi writing style. Some of Robert Heinlein's work is in the science fiction genre, but with a humorous writing style.