dogriver: (Default)
Blind people really need to take a shot at informing themselves about the Unified English Braille Code. There is so much misinformation floating around. I'm hearing things like, "Oh, as long as we don't lose any of our contractions", or "as long as it doesn't make braille bulkier". I've got news for you, people, with the UEB, we *do* lose contractions, it *does* make braille bulkier. If you do any mathematics at all, say goodbye to Nemeth code and any numbers in the lower part of the cell; if you do any stuff in computer braille code, say goodbye to those lower-part-of-the-cell numbers and so on as well. Say goodbye to the way you're used to doing blocks of capitalized or italicized words. If this is what blind people really want, fine, I was wrong, and I'll accept the wishes of the majority. But at the moment we have a bunch of egos in high places, many sighted, equating apathy among blind people with acceptance of UEB. If it gets rammed down our throats due to apathy, I suppose we have only ourselves to blame. But I've been fighting this for close to fifteen years now. I've been insulted, called uninformed, threatened, labeled as anti-braille, and more. And out of any ten people I ask about UEBC, I mean ten braille readers, eight will tell me they've never heard of UEBC, the ninth has heard of it but never looked at it, and of the remaining ten percent who have looked at it, those in favor tend to belong to the organizations that are pushing UEB. I'm willing to accept UEBC if that's what the people want. But I'm not willing to accept it simply because they didn't care and let it be shoved down our throats. I care.
dogriver: (Default)
It's either ketchup or catsup. Not catchup, katchup, katsup, katch up, catch up, katchip, ketchip, ketchap, or any of the fifteen million other variants I keep seeing over and over and over again. Thank you.
dogriver: (Default)
There is a gentleman in the so-called blindness community who is a self-proclaimed accessibility evangelist. I'm not particularly fond of the term, but that's what he calls himself. And I like the guy, not to mention the fact that he has done a lot by way of improving accessibility in many areas.

One area, though, where I have a great deal of difficulty with this person is his analogies. One of this person's huge concerns is accessible captcha, those words, letters and numbers that you have to type on some Web pages to gain access to a particular product or service. This gentleman is a very strong advocate for what I call partially-accessible captcha. I say partially because he feels a battle is won if an audio captcha is provided, a solution which is no solution at all if you are a deafblind person.

But his analogy with the inaccessible captcha has been comparing our situation to that faced by African-Americans during the civil rights fight. It's a horrid comparison: yes, we need sighted assistance to gain access to these sites, but once in, we face neither death, bodily injuries, threats, nor even persecution. I sincerely doubt that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would have approved of the analogy. Further, this accessibility evengelist says, inaccessible captcha is the same as putting up a "no blind people allowed" sign. This is simply not true. While I agree that captcha or its equivalent should be accessible TO THE BLIND AND TO THE DEAFBLIND, nobody will kick you out if you get sighted assistance to sign you up.

I bring up this dreary subject again because, in my insomniac state, I got to wondering if this gentleman has ever experienced a real "no blind people allowed" sign. A dear friend of mine was in China recently. She told me that, in front of some public facilities, were signs that proclaimed that any disabled person caught trying to use the facilities would be arrested. It really made me stop and think how good we ahve it here. It's not perfect, to be sure. There are lots of things that could be improved. But as a disabled person, there are many more discriminatory places I could be living in than Canada or the United States.

It just seems very, very wrong to me, and I'm not saying this to pick a fight, to use analogies to represent the problems of something like inaccessible captcha and compare them to true oppression, to true, intentional discrimination. It seems insulting to those who suffered and even died in the causes sited by that analogy to compare them to something as, let's face it, minor in the grand scheme of things as captcha.
dogriver: (Default)
So just who's suposed to pay for it? People want a free LJ that is just charitably donated to them? Uh-uh. If you don't want to pay for it, let them find someone who will and accept the ads. As one of my best friends likes to say, suck it up princes/princesses. Personal opinion, rant over.

Bleh

Mar. 17th, 2008 08:05 am
dogriver: (Default)
I dunno, today's just starting off as one of those blah kind of days. I
just hope people at work more or less leave me alone unless there's
something specific they need or want from me. Handi-transit driver this
morning asked me not to talk on my cellphone on my way to work. That's
fine, he was nice about it and it's certainly his right to do so, but it
made for a boring trip.

Today's just the sort of day I'd rather just lie in bed all day and read
stuff I actually want to read. It's a Star Trek Voyager book that I
started yesterday and I'm really getting into it. It's nice enjoying
reading again. Or it was. Now it's back to this textbook.

I was at my mom's yesterday, we celebrated Easter a week early. Mom's
getting older, that's getting obvious, and it hurts to see it. So many
things about my parents I didn't appreciate enough as a kid. Now one's
gone, and who knows how long the other one'll be around. I've got to
show Mom how much I appreciate her while I still can, while there's
still time. I don't want regrets later.

The new hearing aids were a rousing success. They made my mom so happy
yesterday. But I'm getting sick of talking about them. I'm getting sick
of everyone telling me how difficult it was before I got them, as if I
hadn't been painfully aware of that; I'm sick of everyone whispering
around me to see if I'll understand them or not. Yes, it took me a long
time to get them, but we're talking about a lot of money, and I paid for
these things entirely, 100% out of my own pocket, nobody helped me with
it. I'd sacrificed a lot of the things I wanted to make this happen, and
yes it took a while, but I still did it. So pardon me while I treat
myself to a few things for a little while that I've been denying myself
... Like a decent computer.
dogriver: (Default)
1. Why do people like standing right in front of the panel of buttons in
an elevator, then when you step in and have to reach around and over
them to push your button (it's worse when it's a woman and the elevator
buttons are at crotch level), they get indignant as if it's their
elevator and what business have you choosing a floor?

2. When you're standing between two sets of double doors, and it's minus
a zillion out there, why is it that if someone is going to go through
the outer door, they'll always pick the door you're standing right in
front of? I mean, he or she will walk into the foyer on the other side,
walk past you on the right, then cut back to the left just in front of
you to use the door that's most likely to have you freeze your
gashtorkers off!
dogriver: (Default)
You've gotta love it. The government says to us, "Thank you for
contributing to our economy. Thank you for the job you do, which helps
to make our job easier by making this one of the better places in the
world to live. As our way of saying thanks, the more you contribute to
the economy, the more you do for us, the more you do to pull your fair
share of the burden in this country, the more we'll charge you for the
privilege. And hey, if you don't contribute, you don't get charged."
dogriver: (Default)
Okay, 3:30. I'm outta hear at 3:50. Well, I'm finished work, anyway ...
My ride doesn't get here until 4:12. I think I'll stop off at the
grocery store on my way home to get some Coke, unless I get Chuckles the
laugh-a-minuted driver I had coming home last Friday.

It has been suggested that I pursue the possibility of clinical
depression. I appreciate the concern behind that suggestion. I don't
believe what I am experiencing to be clinical depression, neither does
my doctor. I was on anti-depressants in the mid-nineties, under pressure
from Tammy. My doctor and I both decided that the only reason I was on
them was that Tammy wanted me to be on them, because she didn't want to
be the only one in the relationship who was on these things. Please
understand, Tammy was an exception in so many ways, I don't want to
imply for a second that all, or even most people who need these
medications are like that. But it was most certainly the case with
Tammy, though.She tried so hard to get me to believe I was dealing with
the same things she believed she was dealing with. Poor girl, I don't
know if she even realized that she destroyed her relationship with her
family, with me, with her friends, with my friends, with her partner
after me, and with the medical profession that tried to help her.

Depression

Feb. 20th, 2008 08:08 am
dogriver: (Default)
I've been in a mild state of depression for the past few weeks or so.
There is no one reason for this, certainly no one is the cause of it, I
just have been feeling more down than usual lately. Going to work every
morning and staying there is exceedingly difficult for me. I like my
job, I like my co-workers, I'm treated fairly for the most part, but I'm
sick of working. Twelve years is a long time. Yes, I know, many better
people than I have worked for much longer, but I bet even the best of
them has just wanted to pack it all in from time to time, unless you're
one of that rare breed, someone doing what they absolutely love. I used
to love to read. All through school and beyond I loved to read. And,
indeed, if I'm on vacation and find myself with a good book, that love
of reading is temporarily rekindled. I love it when that happens. But
unfortunately, twelve years of reading crap have jaded me.

I'm grateful for what I have, really I am, but if a guy can't use his LJ
to just talk about his feelings, then what's the point?

I long for April, when I can again board a plane and visit Caroline in
Milwaukee. I think back to the magic that was my trip back in November.
Can that magic be rekindled? I honestly don't know. Maybe one must
create a new kind of magic, equally wonderful but different, each time.
Being in a loving relationship of equals is still a very new thing for
me: I certainly wasn't in it with Tammy, who felt the only way she could
get what she wanted was by threatening, taunting, and hitting me, or
withholding any signs of affection from me. What I have now is so
different from all that, and I find myself having to learn how to walk
in a relationship without my theoretical hand being in front of my
theoretical face in preemptive self-defense.

Bob, one of my co-workers, has gone over my passport with me to be sure
the information in it is correct. I've signed it, so that part of my
pre-trip requirements is completed. I expect to have my ticket at the
end of the week, all things being equal.
dogriver: (Default)
Several years ago, a mailing list to discuss technology from a blindness perspective was formed, called Blindtech. Since it got started, the list changed ownership several times, but was always in the hands of moderators who did their best to be fair and unbiased. In September of 2006, the list was passed along to me, but after running it for seven months or so, I decided that I just had too much on my hands to continue running the list. I passed the list on to the person I felt was best suited to run the list.

Since that time, I sincerely believe that the unbiasedness of the Blindtech list has come under severe fire. There is one poster in particular, whom I shall not name, who believes himself to be one of the elite in terms of technical skills and abalities. This gentleman has become a moderator favorite. Though he often speaks on subjects about which he knows little or nothing, has been known many times to give incorrect or misleading advice, he writes with such an air of authority that newer users of adaptive technology tend to take his word as gospel. If Mr. X says it, it must be true.

The moderators, as I have said, have really taken a liking to this person. Though he is embroiled in the middle of about 90% of the arguments that take place on that list, though he is the common denominator in most on-list disputes and disagreements, though his my-way-orit's-the-wrong-way authoritative writing style have irritated many, the moderators consistently choose to side with him and vilify those who would dare question his rightness on all matters related to computers.

This is, I fear, all too common. Just under a year ago, a list member very viciously slandered another list member on-list. The moderators, at the time, chose to come down hard on anyone who dared to defend the slandered list member, insisting that we forgive the slanderer. Because of public outcry on the list, the slanderer was forced to offer an apology which was clearly not sincere. See, said the moderators, everything's fine now.

This sad state of overwhelmingly obvious favoritism and coddling on the parts of the moderators has led me to feel something I thought I'd never feel: grievously sad that I gave up the Blindtech list. I feel I have let the founder of the list, a friend of mine, down. Of course, no one will speak out because they do not wish to deal with the backlash from the moderators, but I felt and feel the truth must be told.

the last time I wrote an opinion piece about strange goings on in the so-called blindness community, my LJ post was posted to the Blindtech list by people claiming to have uncovered it. Well, let me assure you that you have uncovered nothing - that's what public post means.
dogriver: (Default)
This is the latest commentary I wrote for my One Guy's Thoughts commentaries. While I don't for a second feel this spiel will win me a popularity contest, I'm saying what I feel needs to be said, something few others would have the guts to say:

Tomorrow, February 18, is Louis Riel Day here in Manitoba. It's a holiday whose name, we are told, was picked by Manitoba schoolchildren. I can't be sure, but I rather suspect that, if schoolchildren did in fact pick the name, they were heavily coached to do so.

Louis Riel was a man who was hung for treason. He was Métis, meaning he was of French and Native North American descent. He is hailed by many as being the father of Manitoba, a hero who was horribly mistreated by the government of the day. It is not the scope of this diatribe to go into the life of M. Riel, but there are many sources on the Net for that info.

So is he a hero or a murdering traitor? Depends who you ask, because it's very much a contentious issue, though most people daring to question his hero status will, of course, not speak up, because daring to so much as question the holiness and rightness of any Native of Métis cause these days immediately brands you as a bigoted racist. Also, and here I speak as someone who proofreads textbooks for a living, today's Social Studies (or as I call them Social Engineering) classes are extremely intent on portraying M. Riel as a hero, the father of Manitoba, and a helpless victim of an evil race, i.e. the race to which I belong. To vilify whites is, of course, never racist under any circumstances, says today's modern society, we're all guilty, whether we had a thing to do with it or not.

Did M. Riel get the short end of the stick? Was he treated wrongly? Probably, to some extent. To what extent, I could not say, since I doubt a truly unbiased account of the situation (either way) exists, and I wasn't there. Are we simply moving from one extreme to another my giving him a status closing in on sainthood? I rather expect so. I expect that, as is so often the case, the truth lies somewhere within the two extremes. Do I apologize humbly for the way M. Riel was treated? Absolutely not: while I do belong to the "race of pure evil", neither I nor my ancestors weren't even on the continent. We didn't do it, I didn't do it; I didn't condone it, sanction it, support it, encourage it, permit it, or wish for it. I have enough trouble keeping up with those things for which I do owe people an apology. I will not pass up the holiday we get tomorrow, but neither will I pass judgment one way or another on M. Riel. That task is up to Someone who was there, Someone who can offer an unbiased decision, someone not swayed by the government of the day, the will of the mobs, the mythmakers, nor the textbook writers.

Well, anyway, those are one guy's thoughts.
dogriver: (Default)
I propose a new law: Protests should be allowed only if the people doing
the protesting are actually the ones with a grievance. In this day and
age, the art of the protest has become such that protestors organize,
hire professional people and people off the street to add to their
numbers, take classes on how best to make nuissances of themselves, go
out of their way to make life as miserable as possible for as many
people as possible, most of whom have or had absolutely nothing to do
with what is being protested, then expect to have generated a spirit of
goodwill among those whose lives they disrupted. "I'm going to make you
late for work, and show up at work with dirt on your suit because of the
stones I've been throwing, as I protest something someone you never met
did to someone who is only related to me by money back in a time when
neither of us was alive; I expect you to be as inconvenienced as
possible by this, to then thank me, and as you pick up your unemployment
checkk, to tell the reporters how valid my cause is" is the basic
message these people are trying to get across here. Well, I protest.

I Hate UPS

Feb. 13th, 2008 10:12 am
dogriver: (Default)
I've mentioned my hatred of UPS before. Said hatred grows and grows. I have had a package shipped to me. It's scheduled to arrive today. The package is in Winnipeg. It is now in Winnipeg. To deliver it, they need to go from the airport to the downtown, it's maybe a ten-minute truck ride if they stop for coffee along the way. Now I get told that the package has experienced an exception due to adverse weather conditions. Let's see what those adverse weather conditions are, shall we? Okay, it's a little chilly. Okay, it's cloudy. Even so, visibility is ten miles. We are not in the middle of a snowstorm, people. Heck, it's not even snowing? What, have they resorted to delivering by bicycle? Was their service getting too reliable? Must've been. I've already seen them hold packages that were waiting in the city for three extra days so they would be sure not to deliver before the scheduled date. I wish I had a job with UPS. You get to stay at home in your jammies because there's a flake of snow on the ground!
dogriver: (Default)
I subscribe to a lot of mailing lists, mostly because amid the hundreds
of useless messages I get a day, there is the occasional nugget of
useful stuff.

One thread which shouldn't have gotten started on the GW Micro list but
did is, "Why is Window-Eyes superior to JAWS?" These are both screen
reader programs for the blind.

First, you don't ask a question like that on the Gw Micro list ... Or
you shouldn't be allowed to, at any rate. Of course, GW Micro loves it,
because it's yet another chance for loyal Window-Eyes users to bow down
and kiss GW Micro's feet, something Window-Eyes users are wont to do,
for whatever reason.

Now, I don't believe Window-Eyes to be the superior product, not by a
long shot. It's a good program, it's given thousands access to the
computer and it's done so satisfactorally for most of those people.
Great. But in my opinion, and this is an unsolicited, personal,
completely unscientific opinion which may not necessarily be shared by
anyone else, i.e. I'm not speaking on anyone else's behalf here but my
own, JAWS has a much more intuitive interface. It is, in my view, laid
out much more to look and feel like a part of Windows whan Window-Eyes,
which always, always feels like an add-on to me. JAWS feels like a
Windows screen reader to me, while Window-Eyes has always felt, and
continues to feel, like a Dos screen reader modified to work with
Windows. Yes, I have tried both. Until last year, I was a fully licensed
and up-to-date Window-Eyes user as well, though my screen reader of
choice has always been JAWS.

But, as obviously right as my opinions seem to me, it's a very objective
thing. On the GW Micro list, I am reading people say that they feel
Window-Eyes to be far superior, that they feel the WE interface to be
much more intuitive, and that to them JAWS seems like a Dos screen
reader modified to work with Windows while Window-Eyes has a more
Windows look and feel.

It's the stranges thing, two camps taking very opposite stances, and
both sides astounded that anyone could possible think otherwise.
dogriver: (Default)
Holy crap is it ever cold! A short walk between my ride and the door to
the building here at work seemed like an eternity! It was another
morning where the temperature was -30 Celcius, and the wind chill was
-43. It's juts plain cold and I've had enough of it already!

Psychology

Feb. 7th, 2008 08:43 am
dogriver: (Default)
When I started proofreading this psychology book, I had pretty much decided that I didn't like it. This was due, I think, principally to two things. First, I instinctively mistrust "psychobabble". Ever since Tammy, who played into that kind of thing to the hilt, I have mistrusted it, because I saw how the system helped to mess her up ... and messed up she was. I also decided from the beginning that I don't like this book because some of Dr. Glasser's assertions made right from the beginning are ones I wholeheartedly disagree with. For example, he asserts that failing students in school is child abuse. I'll never buy into that. He also asserts that punishment of any kind is very inappropriate, and again, I'll never buy into that.

So this book had two strikes against it right there, in my book. but I find myself just over halfway through this book now, and I have to say that there is a lot that Dr. Glasser has to say with which I do agree, and agree strongly.

For one thing, his methodology for solving relationship problems and marriage counseling makes a great deal of sense to me. It starts out by asserting that the only person whose behavior we are capable of changing is ourself. This is, of course, absolutely true. So rather than focus on changing the other person, which invariably involves what Glasser refers to as "external control" in which we try to force our will on someone, we look at what we can change in ourselves. You put the relationship ahead of the people in it, in this respect. If all parties in a relationship are willing to do that, then negotiations can be made and compromises reached. He refers to it as a "solving circle" which strikes me as rather gimicky, but the concept itself is sound enough: all parties discuss what they are willing to give and sacrifice for the relationship, rather than spending their times demanding. The key, and this is something I've been realizing before the book already, is communication, communication, communication.

All that said, I need a Coke.
dogriver: (Default)
We had a bit of a situation at work here. We were given the afternoon of Christmas Eve off, which is of course fine and good. Then about a month before Christmas, it may well have coincided with when I was in Milwaukee, we got this e-mail saying that our office will be closed for the morning, too, and we will be required to make up that time before the end of March. No choice in the matter, only a month's notice. Anyway, this lunch hour I finally made up the rest of the time, so I've got that monkey off my back.

So now I'm sitting here reading this Choice Theory book. Someone tried to tell me about twelve years ago that all arthritis was due to bitterness. Now I know where he and his wife got this idea from, because what this Choice Theory books says is much along the same lines. This doctor contends that autoimmune diseases are "our creativity responding destructively to difficulty in our lives". I try to examine this in the framework of my dad, who died of an abominably horible autoimmune disease called Wegener's Granulomatosis. It just doesn't compute with what this Dr. Glasser is contending. I doubt that Dad would have agreed either. I miss him.
dogriver: (Default)
I'm trying to find the most comfortable way to do my job. My favorite
way of reading is to put the book on my chest, sideways, and read
top-to-bottom, because that's the natural hand motion, and since I read
with one hand only, this makes sense to me. I've taken to this same
philosophy when reading with a Pac Mate. The most comfortable way to
read is in an easy chair in the living room, with my Pac Mate sideways,
reading top-to-bottom.

But I'm here in the office. Not an easychair in sight, not even a Pac
Mate, as mine's on its way to Florida.Did I ever tell you how much I
LOVE UPS, by the way? So I'm trying to find as comfortable a way as I
can to proofread.
dogriver: (Default)
I'm not going to say that everything went wrong, nobody can say
that, and some things did go right. But a lot of things did go wrong.

First of all I woke up just before two and couldn't fall back to sleep.
I finally got to bed just after four, and spent the rest of the night
dreaming that I couldn't fall asleep.

I woke up and, as per tradition, called Caroline and talked to her for a
few minutes. That was pleasant as always. Then I almost didn't find my
Coke money, but I did find it just in time. I got to work this morning,
got Coke from the pop machine upstairs, and proceeded to put it in my
little cooler. One of the cans fell out, and onto the floor, bursting.

So that's been my fun-filled morning. I could really do with something
very good happening today. I'm trying to ignore this monitor in front of
me and the dual slaps in the face it represents to me. I feel very
unloved at the moment. I know I'm not, I know that there are those worse
off than me, but this is how I'm feeling and that's all there is to it.
dogriver: (Default)
So Tiger Direct is offering what looks like a fabulous computer at a
fabulous price. Trouble is, as wonderful as the price is, 4 hours only,
I don't have four hundred bucks to blow right at the moment. Talk to me
in six months and I should be able to swing it, I definitely need a new
computer. But Arg!

Profile

dogriver: (Default)
Bruce Toews

May 2022

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 12:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios